Poshfpg
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2022
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 229
- Reaction score
- 266
- Location
- London
- Vehicles
- CT4S Smart #3
Frank @f1eng would suggest N rating is a very real thing and we all bow to his knowledge in technical areas. As a result I held off until they were N rated in other sizes meaning while possibly slightly different in construction there wouldn't be a significant difference. Agree on the cost issue, shopping around can save serious £s.Those are too narrow for RS Spyder rims.
MY25 cars have narrower rims and these tyres.
I appreciate I am a huge cynic, but the N rating piece is more about manufacturer deals than anything genuinely material on the tyre's abilities on any given car.
They are so slow with the ratings that if you stick religiously to what they insist on, you often have tyres that are several generations older than the best tyres available.
If they rate a 285, they're going to need a really good excuse not to accept a 305 of the same type.
Of course dealers won't fit them necessarily as there will be supply deals happening that will cause issues (my cynical view).
I've never stuck to marque "certified" tyres across a number of performance marques and have always had far better performance than the originally specified tyres.
YMMV.
(BTW, I have also yet to find a main dealer who is cheaper for the exact same tyres than you can get elsewhere. Often by a very large margin - £100+ per tyre in some cases).
Tyres are use case specific, it's our main family car so can have bike rack, roof box and dog in boot on long trips so increased efficiency is of primary importance. For the number of times I blast an Alpine road I can take a slight loss of on the edge handling for 15% + more range getting to said Alpine road.
There is no insurance issue at all, if they tyres meet weight size requirements and are UK legal you are fine.
Sponsored