D00notD00d
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- D00notD00d
- Joined
- May 17, 2023
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 979
- Reaction score
- 605
- Location
- Newcastle
- Vehicles
- L461 Range Rover Sport. Gone: Taycan 4s, Cayenne, 911 C4S.
From the pics you’ve provided, this isn’t reckless damage.
1) This is accidental damage and therefore should be covered by insurance. Focus there.
or
2) Pursue a legal case against Porsche USA. A consumer law specialist or Industry dispute Ombudsman could help. You could contend that the fault is not attributable to fair wear and tear - the root problem is a design flaw, inadequate clearance between the protective cover and the expensive gubbins it is there to protect, and/or the protective cover material isn’t sufficient, unfit for purpose.
The Taycan ground clearance is around 126mm, 5”. A 3mm tolerance above that before incurring $72k damage is ludicrous.
Usually a case like this would require the independent opinion of a qualified engineer. The difficuly there could be finding someone with sufficient BEV experience to act as an expert witness. There’s unlikely to many of those around.
1) This is accidental damage and therefore should be covered by insurance. Focus there.
or
2) Pursue a legal case against Porsche USA. A consumer law specialist or Industry dispute Ombudsman could help. You could contend that the fault is not attributable to fair wear and tear - the root problem is a design flaw, inadequate clearance between the protective cover and the expensive gubbins it is there to protect, and/or the protective cover material isn’t sufficient, unfit for purpose.
The Taycan ground clearance is around 126mm, 5”. A 3mm tolerance above that before incurring $72k damage is ludicrous.
Usually a case like this would require the independent opinion of a qualified engineer. The difficuly there could be finding someone with sufficient BEV experience to act as an expert witness. There’s unlikely to many of those around.
Sponsored