f1eng
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Frank
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2021
- Threads
- 48
- Messages
- 4,765
- Reaction score
- 8,335
- Location
- Oxfordshire, UK
- Vehicles
- Taycan CT4S, Ferrari 355, Merc 500E, Prius PHV
Oh dear.The point was that you could raise profits per unit while demand is greater than production. ?
I began typing a more sensible answer, but it's not the first time that one of your posts casts a very slanted view of Porsche and their history. (Flicks off the safety on the flame thrower.)
Ferrari was an arrogant peasant who stole his employer's design, went racing with it and found some success amid modest competition. His strike of genius was finding the right color (and shade of it) to "instill passion" and then milk gullible celebrities of the money required to fund the next race. Insidiously, the same "passion" worked out well for shirking out of paying his drivers more than a pittance. The same philosophy (or, rather, myth) is perpetuated by the company to present day, where they have built a formidable apparel business that they use to finance a mediocre racing effort (well, it's improving) and selling a handful of shoddy, fragile road cars - that somehow are gaudier still than the apparel they're promoting.
(How am I tracking?)
Meanwhile, on the other side, Porsche as a clan have invented the electro-mobile, the mid-engine racing car layout (with Auto Union), the "light robust cars win endurance races" approach long before Chapman rode a trike, and the supercar for the road concept - meaning something that you _can_ drive even if it's not a sunny Sunday. They've arguably been more successful at the racing they do than Ferrari, throughout their respective history. (Not a lot of apparel making, though even that is more utility-focused like, say, a rain jacket.)
Where exactly was the "right" point up the market where Porsche should have stopped?
I suppose you are glad to have got that off your chest.
I am not now, nor ever have been a fan of a brand.
What Ferdinand Porsche designed as an employee decades ago for Auto Union, for example, were admirable but have nothing whatsoever to do with today’s car company.
Ferrari took advantage of brand fans outrageously as you know. What they do now has nothing much to do with history either, their :”limited edition” runs today are huge compared to their normal production in the 60s and 70s.
The people who made them what they were are all dead or retired.
Sponsored