Search results

in J-1772/CCS vehicles like the Taycan/Macan EV (Cayenne comes with NACS native for fast charging, but you'll still need a NACS/J-1772 adatper for NACS L2 AC chargers - since the NACS port on the Cayenne is for DCFast charging only) - in North America you need two adapters: Tesla Superchargers...

this reminds me of the EVSE power supply overheating problems Porsche took forever to acknowledge and resolve…and they are running their normal playbook of "blame the victim" for the problems - it couldn't possibly be our software/hardware/product… for those that wanna play along at home you...

https://ev-lectron.com/products/lectron-tesla-to-j1772-ev-adapter-250v-80-amp Lectron is the same company that makes the Porsche NACS/CCS1 Adapter for North American Supercharger access the NACS/CCS1 adapter is for "fast charging" the adapter linked above is for L2 Charging @ Tesla Destination...

a factory reset of the ChargePoing flex charger should return it to max power - please make sure your setting is appropriate for your breaker size and wire gauge. there have been reports of ChargePoint flex chargers reverting to a lower AMP setting for no particular reason - this is easily...

it's defaulted to 50% - press the 50% buitton at the top of the unit to enable 100% charging… or if your unit has a LCE screen find the settings and adjust the maximum amps back to 40 amps… this is most likely a default setting which Porsche trotted out years ago when they were meltling NEMA...

I give a lot to be in that room to hear the discussion… the room where it happens…

this makes no sense - fast charging at a Supercharger has no relationship to 11/22 kW AC charging…

that's not the car… note the quote under the picture "What will the final Ferrari Luce look like? We can only guess."

ok so the question is would Porsche actually build it that way?

I agree with most of your post and share your sentiments - but they've been pretty clear they are de-emphasizing EV's in favor of future ICE and Hybrid vehicles…they are also losing market share and made like a total for $7.52 profit in 2025…a terrible year for them money wise… they also have a...

price with a competitive discount to make Porsche's EV's more "competitive" vs. credible alternatives… updated the post to make that point clear

if you accept the premise of Porsche's shrinking competitive moat with regards to EV's - they lost their main weapon of mechanical/technical complexity for relaible/impressive ICE performance… we then also have to factor in the sorts of things Porsche has chosen not to master and/or lags behind...

you can use the myPorsche app to start/stop charging at Tesla Supercharger's or you can use the Tesla app (as discussed in this thread) or at V4 superchargers you can use their LCD screen and "tap to pay" credit card to start a charging session - V3 superchargers do not have LCD screens and...

#metoo 100% - well said

context...

friendly $1 bet it’s nearly fact - i’m sad also 🙁 but yeah we will have to wait to find out my guess is this has been tee’d up for months internally - but you need the new CEO to make this call - not the outgoing one… decisions like this are rarely “out of the blue” and there has to have been...

agree 100% - but it means I don't get me no Porsche EV in the future :oops: I like the watch analogy and agree with it - and those watch makers that are doing well are increasingly more and more expensive and less mass market… Porsche will do what is necessary to survive no doubt - but it will...

disappointing no doubt but unsurprising the EV 718/Cayman/Boxster has been just about to be released since 2020…and that was when Porsche liked EV's… Porsche can't price their EV's to be 'competitive' because then the EV would undercut the ICE versions… And Porsche's ICE prices are creeping...

same - thanks for the facts!

thanks for the facts - I'm rocking a Macan these days - I appreciate the assist!!