Sponsored

New Cayenne EV impact on Taycan Values

Gino

Well-Known Member
First Name
Gino
Joined
Apr 2, 2024
Threads
29
Messages
889
Reaction score
446
Location
Orange County, CA
Vehicles
2000 Boxster & 2021 Taycan
Country flag
Handling, it definitely handles better than an audi platform and a SUV body, despite what Macan EVs might claim.

But most people buying a 4 door car don't give a rats ass about handling

Makes you wonder what the fk is so expensive in the taycan, that a taycan turbo/s is 250k; with smaller battery, weaker older motors, weaker inveters, outdated computers, software from the antiquity times, shit interior space... and still a Cayenne turbo with better everything technology wise, is cheaper.

I doubt the taycan turbo s costs 250k to make and a cayenne turbo costs 160k. Likely they both cost closer to 120k :)

I suspect porsache put a +100k on taycans to cover platform development costs, and while using the audi platform for the cayenne, they simply didn't have to put a +100k. Otherwise it makes no sense how they improved tech in 1-2 years quite a bit (even compared to taycan GT), while reducing the cost by 100k+ apparently.
Porsche counts on a select group of buyers who will pay a huge premium to get the best of the best performance at that $250k number but that doesn’t translate to used high end Taycans. I wouldn’t pay that same huge premium for a CPO Taycan Turbo. That’s why I bought a nicely equipped Taycan RWD CPO with the standard battery.
I could care less about the range since I have 2 other vehicles for completely different purposes. My H2 Hummer blows away the Cayenne or Macan EVs because I need storage space and the ability to drive over anything. My Airstream Mercedes Sprinter van is for long trips & weekend camping which the Cayenne & Macan would be completely insufficient for. I could care less about how fast my H2 or Sprinter goes. I could care less about depreciation or fuel efficiency on these specialty vehicles which only get driven 2500 to 3500 miles per year.
Regarding my Taycan, I bought it knowing I will never sell it so depreciation is of no concern to me which was why I bought the CPO after a $30K drop in price from sticker.
The Taycan is the most beautiful sports sedan ever built for less than $80K CPO.
Macans & Taycans are for people looking to combine uses of multiple vehicles in one platform. I could care less.
My next vehicle (without selling any of my existing vehicles) will likely be a 911 convertible which gives me enough interior space in a sports car and the convertible top I miss since my Boxster got t-boned in 2021.
Again, I will buy a CPO since I won’t drive it more than 4000 miles a year and more likely 2500 when I have both the Taycan & an ICE 911. It won’t be a turbo. I won’t pay the premium for a turbo when the base is plenty fast enough.
If I had all the money in the world burning a hole in my pocket then maybe I might splurge and pay the ridiculous premium Porsche puts on it’s turbos but the fact I will never put more than 50K miles on any Porsche over 20 years I would likely still buy a fully depreciated CPO than feel taken advantage of by Porsche or any other vehicle maker. I remember the days of the ADMUs (Additional Dealer Mark Ups) which were charged to people who just couldn’t wait to get a limited availability vehicle so they pay crazy premiums to get a depreciating asset.
I don’t waste money on ADMUs or grossly inflated list prices which are insulting to me. I’d rather give the premium to a charity than Porsche just so I could shave a second or two off my zero to 60.
My only concerns on my Taycan are “How long will the battery last?” & “What will it cost to replace the battery?” Both of these questions will be answered in due time before my extended warranty ends in 2030. I doubt Porsche or third party battery service centers will price battery replacements so high that these gorgeous Taycans will be considered a disposable worthless asset after 8 years. Batteries will cost less than $20K to replace in 2030 which I will gladly pay to get another 8 years guaranteed and likely 12-15 years where my Taycan in Southern California will still look perfect. I have friends with 40+ year old 911s that are perfect and I doubt Porsche will allow their Taycan or their EVs in general to not stand the test of time. If they do stop supporting them the Porsche will be done & finished as a premium brand.
Sponsored

 

69Mach390

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2025
Threads
9
Messages
837
Reaction score
574
Location
Florida
Vehicles
24 Taycan 4S
Country flag
That's just not true.
Porsche plays difficult with allocation on certain 911s, and did so with taycans during covid, and are still doing with Macan EVs - and they for sure will pull the same shit with the Cayennes, when they release next June
Building and selling a limited supply is different than what was suggested- that they build a bunch of cars and have them sit somewhere for a year before releasing them to dealers.
 

cometguy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2018
Threads
7
Messages
358
Reaction score
326
Location
New England, USA
Vehicles
'21 Taycan CT4; '18 Panamera 4 ST E-Hybrid (past); Cayenne 4 Electric (planned)
Country flag
I need some ground clearance, which is why I have a Cross Turismo. I had two low-slung Panameras previously, and I kept scraping bottom on driveway dips and on speed bumps (despite having air suspension and lift modes on both); this hasn't happened once yet in my Cross Turismo. The Cayenne EV looks better (exterior) to the Cayenne ICEV -- but nowhere near as nice as the Taycan, of course.

What the Cayenne EV has that my Taycan doesn't have, which attract me, are: even better ground clearance; I can get an all-metal roof here in the US; normal door handles; much better range (50% better, roughly, at 70 mph); faster DCFC charging speeds; can get a heated windshield; more storage capacity behind the front seat and more rear-seat legroom; much better cockpit, in three ways (better screens, better front-seat storage design, and physical controls for climate controls); better visibility via larger side mirrors and out larger rear window; dual sun visors for both front-seat occupants.

The two biggest things that I don't like (other than the exterior appearance and presumed worse handling) concern charging in the Cayenne EV: an electronic-only charge-port door; and the NACS-only fast-charging port (as a road-tripper, I find far more plentiful CCS stations than NACS stations currently, meaning I'll need to use a NACS-to-CCS adapter more often than not, based on my travels across 17 states this year -- though this could change 3-5 years from now). I wish that Porsche put a CCS port on one side and a NACS port on the other side in the Cayenne EV (they have only a J1772 port on the passenger side, and NACS on the driver side).
Sponsored

 
  • Like
Reactions: jww
 








Top