WasserGKuehlt
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2022
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 2,066
- Reaction score
- 2,456
- Location
- WA
- Vehicles
- 4CT, 996C2, MacanS
[...]They have added a lot of chargers into its database now – and because its algorithm isn't very smart – that is causing it to pick more and more inappropriate charging stops.
[...]
The thing that drives us crazy on a road-trip is that as you drive – or get map updates – it keeps changing your stops. No normal person is going to be happy with that.
To clarify my earlier statement, that is what I was trying to say - the _charge planning_ aspect (car and app) is very poor, and its estimates are off - by a lot. As an example, Seattle to Whistler is ~220 miles with a good chunk of it in the mountains, and it thinks somehow that all it takes is 1 stop of 1 minute! Furthermore, as it tries to plan a longer route, it rushes to present _some_ options and you end up seeing - while driving - weird stops far from the main route. It settles as it backtracks, but the settling takes a while (the order of minutes) and that's disconcerting, to say the least.I have to say that in my case – I find the PCM/built-in consumption estimates very accurate to one or two percentage points – if I drive calmly and to speed limits. Outside of battery pre-condition – its the other feature that has me using the PCM over Carplay apps. I've learnt to really trust the consumption estimates.
The range estimation, on the other hand, I do agree is very good. If you give it a destination that doesn't require charging/a stopover, it's absolutely spot-on both wrt range and arrival SoC. So I've learned to do my (charge) planning on the side, and use the PCM nav mainly to keep track of my consumption; I'll ignore its stop suggestions, or manually override with my own.
Sponsored