daveo4EV
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- David
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2019
- Threads
- 192
- Messages
- 7,006
- Reaction score
- 10,473
- Location
- Santa Cruz
- Vehicles
- Cayenne Hybrid, 911(s) GT3/Convertable
- Thread starter
- #61
JD powers counts "problems" not "impact" - their data is accurate, butYou do understand that this “data” suggests that Porsches average 1.75 problems per vehicle while Tesla averages 2.52, right?
2.52 is definitely higher than 1.75, but “slightly less than 2” vs “slightly more than 2” is hardly a catastrophic/significant difference.
JD Power is to be respected (?) for discovering a way to monetize (and sensationalize) data like this, but understanding the true meaning behind the information is the key.
Their methods have NOT kept up with automotive technology, and to @AutoX’s point, JD Power treats an OTA update the same as an HV battery failure when it comes to “problems”. That is obviously the wrong way to treat those issues, but if they didn’t, their reports would be far less compelling as automotive flash points...and more importantly, far less profitable.
the following statement stands on it's own and is neither pro/con - it's both…
there is ample data about what it is and isn'tTesla's reputation is well deserved
My 2013 Model S P85, 2014 Model S P85D, 2016 Model X P90D, 2017 Model X P100D, 2018 Model 3 Performance, 2021-2023 3xModel Y's - all with over 300k+ combined milesL
never stranded me
had few if any problems, but initial build quality was not upto Porsche standards, but was close to Honda or Nissan in terms of quality - and most of the problem they did have were fixed with OTA update requiring no service visit or home visit
Tesla didn't make a less reliable car or less/more problematic car - but at the Mode S's price point it had more problem/issues that that market segment demanded (paint quality for example still sucks) - I would humbly suggest that the Model 3/Model Y is no worse than any other choice in it's price segment - and again there may be problems, but not all problems are "equal" - given how many Model Y's I see daily driving around - they can't possibly be any worse than anything else I see driving around on the road - Mazda, Kia, Honda, Nissan etc…none of these other choices are immune to problem…
_ALL_ of my Porsches have had more significant problems and are less reliable than my Tesla's - my Porsche's spend way more time in the shop than any of my Tesla's ever did
2008 911 4S
2012 911 GTS
2011 911 GT3
2010 911 GT3 Cupcar
2015 911 GT3 Cupcar
2018 911 GT3
2023 911 GT3 RS
2023 911 GT3
2021 Cayenne Turbo S eHybrid
2020 Taycan Turbo
2022 911 TurboS Cab
2024 Macan Turbo
2015 Boxster S
JD Power's counts "problems" encountered - not all problems are "equal" - but their stats do not reflect "impact" - it's a simple count
my Tesla's had some problems, but the impact was minor (time normally rarely money)
my Porsche's have fewer problems, but the problems I have tend to lead to large impacts (time & money)
I'll stand by my statement that most people bashing Tesla have no actual experience and are simply parroting what they've heard or sensational headline dat that lack nuance
my Porsche's all drive better than _ANY_ of my Tesla's - which is why I put up with them, they also have features/options Tesla's lack, and quality in dimension's Tesla doesn't care about (braking for example) - but they are more problematic - yet I still prefer them…
however the Model S is/was a benchmark car - and was vastly better than most sedans of it's time - and Tesla combine a set of features that was unheard of for any sedan - if you believe it doesn't matter you're simply ignoring the facts and falling back on "tesla's has bad quality" trope's simply demonstrates a lack of depth in analysis or thinking…the Model S shook automotive board rooms across the globe - and most competitors still can't quite match it…
Sponsored
Last edited: