Alfa
Active Member
So the charging to finish at the end of the timer makes sense from a cold climate point of view. But in case I would argue that only the time to leave is relevant. (Adding the start time to the UI just causes confusion for this use case)
To start immediately at the beginning of the timer is the more common use case to get take advantage cheaper night rate or solar at home.
Assume the following use case: one comes home early during the day from a road trip with an empty battery and solar at home. Because of the timer the car does not start charging until the very end of the tine window. It gets cloudy and solar efficiency is bad. Later that day some unplanned trip needs to happen (emergency, forgot something at the hotel etc.) so one gets to the car and it is not charged enough to make the trip.
So when I get frustrated it’s because the engineers tried to solve their problem during winter testing instead of solving (and in fact impairing) the common charing habits. This is not uncommon for engineers to do, it happens all the time in Software engineering.
The actual problem here is that this was not caught be the „release process“. Usually companies that are known for their user friendly experience and seamless „it just works“ architecture employ special UX designers and do focus testing to find these issues and feed the results back into the engineering process. This has not happened to a quality level that can and should be expected for a $100k+ car!
To start immediately at the beginning of the timer is the more common use case to get take advantage cheaper night rate or solar at home.
Assume the following use case: one comes home early during the day from a road trip with an empty battery and solar at home. Because of the timer the car does not start charging until the very end of the tine window. It gets cloudy and solar efficiency is bad. Later that day some unplanned trip needs to happen (emergency, forgot something at the hotel etc.) so one gets to the car and it is not charged enough to make the trip.
So when I get frustrated it’s because the engineers tried to solve their problem during winter testing instead of solving (and in fact impairing) the common charing habits. This is not uncommon for engineers to do, it happens all the time in Software engineering.
The actual problem here is that this was not caught be the „release process“. Usually companies that are known for their user friendly experience and seamless „it just works“ architecture employ special UX designers and do focus testing to find these issues and feed the results back into the engineering process. This has not happened to a quality level that can and should be expected for a $100k+ car!
Sponsored