Sponsored

W1NGE

Well-Known Member
First Name
Adrian
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
11,016
Reaction score
6,805
Location
Aberdeen, Scotland
Vehicles
992.2, ex GTS ST owner, Macan T
Country flag
My latest observations of uPdate now include the completely different behaviour of Range Drive mode (4S, PB+).

It now appears that the rear motor is used predominantly rather than the front motor (historically been this way for the past 2 years). Logic previously was that the front motor was smaller and therefore used less energy.

Briefly notice front and rear motor engaging when on the level before reverting to rear motor.

With cruise active and when descending a gradient the rear motor would engage to brake / maintain speed and then revert to predominantly front motor for inclines - this doesn't appear to be the case now (will review again on Monday when I'm heading back north in case I missed it).

Anyone else observed this?

Both motors are physically shutdown when coasting - previously the AWD display showed energy flows to both motors - I was expecting this as it was stated in the release notes.
Sponsored

 
  • Like
Reactions: B61

Abdul

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2021
Threads
16
Messages
177
Reaction score
95
Location
Glasgow
Vehicles
Gentian Blue Taycan 4S...previously Ice Grey RWD
Country flag
My latest observations of uPdate now include the completely different behaviour of Range Drive mode (4S, PB+).

It now appears that the rear motor is used predominantly rather than the front motor (historically been this way for the past 2 years). Logic previously was that the front motor was smaller and therefore used less energy.

Briefly notice front and rear motor engaging when on the level before reverting to rear motor.

With cruise active and when descending a gradient the rear motor would engage to brake / maintain speed and then revert to predominantly front motor for inclines - this doesn't appear to be the case now (will review again on Monday when I'm heading back north in case I missed it).

Anyone else observed this?

Both motors are physically shutdown when coasting - previously the AWD display showed energy flows to both motors - I was expecting this as it was stated in the release notes.
I don't have the AWD display on my 4S. Should be left tube in instrument display..doesn't even show as an option?
 

tigerbalm

Well-Known Member
First Name
Damien
Joined
Oct 11, 2020
Threads
94
Messages
3,514
Reaction score
7,912
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Website
www.targatrips.com
Vehicles
911 Targa 4 GTS, Fiat 500 EV. Sold: Taycan Turbo S, Taycan 4S; Panamera Turbo S
Country flag
Only issue has been a slow reconnection to LTE when crossing country borders?
Wonder is this different hardware between MY20 and MY21+ ? I made 17 border crossings across 11 countries recently and I was looking specifically at the network connections when crossing the border. It was flawless for me and it had been poor before the update.
 

f1eng

Well-Known Member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Aug 19, 2021
Threads
48
Messages
4,765
Reaction score
8,335
Location
Oxfordshire, UK
Vehicles
Taycan CT4S, Ferrari 355, Merc 500E, Prius PHV
Country flag
My latest observations of uPdate now include the completely different behaviour of Range Drive mode (4S, PB+).

It now appears that the rear motor is used predominantly rather than the front motor (historically been this way for the past 2 years). Logic previously was that the front motor was smaller and therefore used less energy.

Briefly notice front and rear motor engaging when on the level before reverting to rear motor.

With cruise active and when descending a gradient the rear motor would engage to brake / maintain speed and then revert to predominantly front motor for inclines - this doesn't appear to be the case now (will review again on Monday when I'm heading back north in case I missed it).

Anyone else observed this?

Both motors are physically shutdown when coasting - previously the AWD display showed energy flows to both motors - I was expecting this as it was stated in the release notes.
It was announced quite a while ago that the new efficiency developments for '22 models had resulted in range mode using the rear motor most rather than the front.
I was surprised at the time but there are complex interactions at play.
 


Scandinavian

Well-Known Member
First Name
Peter
Joined
Nov 3, 2019
Threads
52
Messages
3,904
Reaction score
3,549
Location
France
Vehicles
Taycan T, Aston Martin DB9, Porsche 996 C4 Cab, i4
Country flag
Wonder is this different hardware between MY20 and MY21+ ? I made 17 border crossings across 11 countries recently and I was looking specifically at the network connections when crossing the border. It was flawless for me and it had been poor before the update.
Could be MY dependant. Will check again on our teturn trip in a weeks time. Once connected though I have found the connection stable and also very stable with the app. So there is clearly a great progress.
 

W1NGE

Well-Known Member
First Name
Adrian
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
11,016
Reaction score
6,805
Location
Aberdeen, Scotland
Vehicles
992.2, ex GTS ST owner, Macan T
Country flag
It was announced quite a while ago that the new efficiency developments for '22 models had resulted in range mode using the rear motor most rather than the front.
I was surprised at the time but there are complex interactions at play.
Yep I guess but it is frustrating given the elapsed time and 'learning' during that period of how this feature worked to now abandon that knowledge and re-learn.

There ought to have been more details published and shared at the point of customers receiving the uPdates IMHO along with a QA exercise to provide assurance that all features (new and updated) were actually working (I've uncovered 3 issues now which worked just fine since day 1 and now broken).
 


Scandinavian

Well-Known Member
First Name
Peter
Joined
Nov 3, 2019
Threads
52
Messages
3,904
Reaction score
3,549
Location
France
Vehicles
Taycan T, Aston Martin DB9, Porsche 996 C4 Cab, i4
Country flag
My latest observations of uPdate now include the completely different behaviour of Range Drive mode (4S, PB+).

It now appears that the rear motor is used predominantly rather than the front motor (historically been this way for the past 2 years). Logic previously was that the front motor was smaller and therefore used less energy.

Briefly notice front and rear motor engaging when on the level before reverting to rear motor.

With cruise active and when descending a gradient the rear motor would engage to brake / maintain speed and then revert to predominantly front motor for inclines - this doesn't appear to be the case now (will review again on Monday when I'm heading back north in case I missed it).

Anyone else observed this?

Both motors are physically shutdown when coasting - previously the AWD display showed energy flows to both motors - I was expecting this as it was stated in the release notes.
Is this also MY dependant?? My car did the same in Range mode as you describe prior to the uPdate. It did use the front motor in the beginning of 2020 bu8t some other SW update change it for my car. So I have been used to the rear motor performing as you describe it.

Also I do not bother with Range mode any longer since the difference in range now is less than 1%. The new efficiency of the sw helps in Normal mode and avoids that annoying limit of 140 km/h.
 

W1NGE

Well-Known Member
First Name
Adrian
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
11,016
Reaction score
6,805
Location
Aberdeen, Scotland
Vehicles
992.2, ex GTS ST owner, Macan T
Country flag
Is this also MY dependant?? My car did the same in Range mode as you describe prior to the uPdate. It did use the front motor in the beginning of 2020 bu8t some other SW update change it for my car. So I have been used to the rear motor performing as you describe it.

Also I do not bother with Range mode any longer since the difference in range now is less than 1%. The new efficiency of the sw helps in Normal mode and avoids that annoying limit of 140 km/h.
I have MY21 )Nov'20). Most odd. I've had all prior updates and the behaviour of Range mode has never altered but is now demonstrably different post uPdate. Not a problem in itself and actually it's beyond me why the motors were never completely disengaged during coasting for obvious reasons from day 1.

My range is down 30+ miles since the uPdate but I sense it may be nudging up again but will be a little hacked off if I don't end up with more than before. Time (and patience) will tell.

Agree that Range mode is now on the margins of benefit.
 

Abdul

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2021
Threads
16
Messages
177
Reaction score
95
Location
Glasgow
Vehicles
Gentian Blue Taycan 4S...previously Ice Grey RWD
Country flag
Interesting...me previous MY21 RWD only ever max of about 240-250 miles. Last charge just before going back end of July. Currently my 4S showing good amd much better range...however maybe due to longer, gentle touring, trips taken since delivery and predicted range based on that?

Porsche Taycan Latest Taycan Software Update Findings and Reviews Thread Screenshot_20220916-142915_My Porsch
 

W1NGE

Well-Known Member
First Name
Adrian
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Threads
53
Messages
11,016
Reaction score
6,805
Location
Aberdeen, Scotland
Vehicles
992.2, ex GTS ST owner, Macan T
Country flag
Interesting...me previous MY21 RWD only ever max of about 240-250 miles. Last charge just before going back end of July. Currently my 4S showing good amd much better range...however maybe due to longer, gentle touring, trips taken since delivery and predicted range based on that?

Screenshot_20220916-142915_My Porsche.webp
I don't think there would be a correlation and remember the estimate here is simply that, an 'estimate'.

Longer trips help with consumption as per an ICE vehicle.

Of more relevance is your average consumption. I'm still at 3.3 miles / kWh which my current reduced range contradicts (would indicate increased consumption).

If you have an MY22 car with the latest updates then that could account for the estimated range increase. That said, check your consumption data to see what you typically get for each mi/kWh.
 

B61

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bine
Joined
May 31, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
2,722
Reaction score
1,724
Location
SI
Vehicles
4S (8/2025), CT4 (9/2021-8/2025, 65k km)
Country flag
My latest observations of uPdate now include the completely different behaviour of Range Drive mode (4S, PB+).

It now appears that the rear motor is used predominantly rather than the front motor (historically been this way for the past 2 years). Logic previously was that the front motor was smaller and therefore used less energy.

Briefly notice front and rear motor engaging when on the level before reverting to rear motor.

With cruise active and when descending a gradient the rear motor would engage to brake / maintain speed and then revert to predominantly front motor for inclines - this doesn't appear to be the case now (will review again on Monday when I'm heading back north in case I missed it).

Anyone else observed this?

Both motors are physically shutdown when coasting - previously the AWD display showed energy flows to both motors - I was expecting this as it was stated in the release notes.
Same here.
plus, i also found out increase of consumption for about 10% (because of rear motor usage?) even if i’m still driving on my daily routes on the same way as before.
 

B61

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bine
Joined
May 31, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
2,722
Reaction score
1,724
Location
SI
Vehicles
4S (8/2025), CT4 (9/2021-8/2025, 65k km)
Country flag
I have MY21 )Nov'20). Most odd. I've had all prior updates and the behaviour of Range mode has never altered but is now demonstrably different post uPdate. Not a problem in itself and actually it's beyond me why the motors were never completely disengaged during coasting for obvious reasons from day 1.

My range is down 30+ miles since the uPdate but I sense it may be nudging up again but will be a little hacked off if I don't end up with more than before. Time (and patience) will tell.

Agree that Range mode is now on the margins of benefit.
+1
I was getting about 420km/100%SoC before uPdate.
now, betwen 380-390km only.
or, maybe that’s just result of battery degradation (after one year, and 21.500km)?
 

Abdul

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2021
Threads
16
Messages
177
Reaction score
95
Location
Glasgow
Vehicles
Gentian Blue Taycan 4S...previously Ice Grey RWD
Country flag
I don't think there would be a correlation and remember the estimate here is simply that, an 'estimate'.

Longer trips help with consumption as per an ICE vehicle.

Of more relevance is your average consumption. I'm still at 3.3 miles / kWh which my current reduced range contradicts (would indicate increased consumption).
I don't think there would be a correlation and remember the estimate here is simply that, an 'estimate'.

Longer trips help with consumption as per an ICE vehicle.

Of more relevance is your average consumption. I'm still at 3.3 miles / kWh which my current reduced range contradicts (would indicate increased consumption).

If you have an MY22 car with the latest updates then that could account for the estimated range increase. That said, check your consumption data to see what you typically get for each mi/kWh.

If you have an MY22 car with the latest updates then that could account for the estimated range increase. That said, check your consumption data to see what you typically get for each mi/kWh.
Hi. Showing as attached

Porsche Taycan Latest Taycan Software Update Findings and Reviews Thread Screenshot_20220918-152205_My Porsch
Sponsored

 
 








Top