69Mach390
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2025
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 837
- Reaction score
- 574
- Location
- Florida
- Vehicles
- 24 Taycan 4S
That is a compromise that is an absolute disaster of a mistake- choosing aerodynamics over looks.While I quite like the bottom car, this highlights the problem that all EV manufacturers face. There is a HUGE premium on aerodynamics for EVs, and this leads to cars that look more alike than not. The Ferrari at least looks distinctive and different from others. The bottom car, as nice as it looks, looks WAYY too much like a Taycan for most Ferrari owners' tastes.
I think they forgot they’re building a Ferrari.
This would be like putting a 250 hp turbo 4 cylinder in a Ferrari for fuel economy.
Ferrari is all about looks and performance. They don’t build commuter cars. Making it ugly so it can have 10 extra miles of range is absurd. Yeah that’s their excuse and they even brag that it’s the “most aerodynamic Ferrari ever.”
Maybe there is an audience for a mini van Ferrari, I just don’t really think they’re out there. And definitely not at $600k.
Sponsored