andrewket
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Andrew
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2021
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 576
- Reaction score
- 434
- Location
- Vienna, VA
- Vehicles
- 21 Taycan Turbo, Tesla Y*2; Prev S,X,3,996TT
I didn't say that EA is implementing a fix. I said it was one hypothesis. It would certainly be a better customer experience and less expensive solution than hardware swaps.it is interesting to me that EA is implementing a fix. this is good, all I care about is that I can get a charge when I need a charge
I think your hypothesis wouldn't pan out if we could analyze the data. I don't think there is a correlation between those that optioned the 19.2kW charger and the amount of public charging one does. My family I road trip a lot since switching to EVs. I spec'd the 19.2kW charger not because I charge a lot at home (I do), or because I think I'm going to find >11kW AC EVSEs in the wild (it happens occasionally), but because I'm on a time of use (TOU) plan at home which provides me with super cheap electricity between 1-5am. I have to charge 3 EVs during this window, and the only way to do it consistently and without having to manually manage everything is with >11kW charging and 3 EVSEs. I used to have ~19.2kW charging on my Teslas too, but Tesla discontinued that option. It's really created problems for me, although I think Tesla may have finally implemented a "charge between x-y to a max SOC of z%" feature. So now my worst case is the Teslas just don't reach the target SOC, whereas before they would charge during the penalty pricing period and cost me $$.Most people who bought the 19.2kW on-board charger option did so because they primarily charge at home. Not having P&C isn't a big deal to them. They won't complain.
Sponsored